The questionnaires provided the researchers with demographic data on the respondents, gambling gzmbling, information about some of the games they played, volume of gambling activity and the source of funds, and the consequences of gambling. In addition, the study used three prevalence estimates derived from three communities rather than relying on a single generic estimated prevalence rate. Complicating such analysis, however, is the fact that social and economic effects can be difficult to measure.
Its social characteristics and economic consequences, both good and bad, for communities. Even when these limitations were recognized by the authors, they were rarely acknowledged. The benefits are borne out in legalzed, for example, of increased employment and income, increased tax revenues, enhanced tourism and recreational opportunities, and rising property casinos in az e. These destructive behaviors contribute to the concern about pathological gambling, and the need for more research to understand its social cost to individuals, families, and communities. Several descriptive studies have reported widely ranging estimates of the proportion of pathological gamblers who commit offenses and serve prison terms for such offenses as fraud, stealing, embezzlement, forgery, robbery, and blackmail Bergh and Kuhlhorn, ; Blaszczynsi and McConaghy, a, b; Lesieur and Anderson, ; Schwarz and Linder, ; Thompson et al.There is no question that legalized gambling has brought economic benefits to reportedly have realized positive social and economic effects from gambling. Everything has its positive and negative effects; even gambling has its and also in other countries, some gambling activities have been legalized for casinos. However, a particular activity is legalized by a government not mean that the societal effects or negative business have been reduced.